Drigger
11-21-2005, 12:39 AM
If anyone watched that game...
The last play of the game was decided on a NO CALL! I have been watching a lot of football and I do believe that was pass interference. The receiver was in double coverage but one of the safety's blocked the receiver from carrying his route so he didn't even have a chance to get it. I was like WHAT NO CALL! I thought after for a few seconds, was that pass interfence?!?! I was like it had to be, because he blocked him from making the catch.
I watched a post game show and the anaylist believe that Edmonton did get away with one and he thought it was pass interference as well.
Even though I am from BC, I do cheer for the BC lions but not a huge fan of the CFL. I don't like their 2 down system as well as in motion wide receivers. But whatever team you were cheering for, I do believe it was pass interference.
Anyone else agree? Or Disagree?
The last play of the game was decided on a NO CALL! I have been watching a lot of football and I do believe that was pass interference. The receiver was in double coverage but one of the safety's blocked the receiver from carrying his route so he didn't even have a chance to get it. I was like WHAT NO CALL! I thought after for a few seconds, was that pass interfence?!?! I was like it had to be, because he blocked him from making the catch.
I watched a post game show and the anaylist believe that Edmonton did get away with one and he thought it was pass interference as well.
Even though I am from BC, I do cheer for the BC lions but not a huge fan of the CFL. I don't like their 2 down system as well as in motion wide receivers. But whatever team you were cheering for, I do believe it was pass interference.
Anyone else agree? Or Disagree?