View Full Version : Update on "fading public"
SICKUMBOY
09-26-2005, 12:53 PM
Just wanted to follow up on my post from last week.
Fading the public when they are on one side over 80% (from sportsbook).
Year to date record was 11-2-2
Yesterdat's results: 3-1
83% on PHIL/OAK over -- WINNER
88% on INDY -- WINNER
84% on DALLAS -- WINNER
85% on SEAT/ARIZ over -- LOSER
Toatal's y-t-d: 14-3-2 (82%)
I would like to be able to post my picks prior to the game starts, however, like I said last week I put my bets in 5 minutes before gametime. This is due to the big moves in these percentages with late money. Anyway you can easily find this info yourself.
As of right now, no action for tonights game
You have the winners posted as losers and vice versa. The public went 1-3 yesterday not 3-1.
OAK went under, and IND and DAL didn't cover. SEA did go over though...
beancounter
09-26-2005, 06:45 PM
Originally posted by sesh
You have the winners posted as losers and vice versa. The public went 1-3 yesterday not 3-1.
OAK went under, and IND and DAL didn't cover. SEA did go over though...
that is what he is saying, if you "faded" you went 3-1.
HOMEDAWG
09-26-2005, 06:45 PM
yup, fading joepub is a winna!:yeah:
Stifler's Mom
09-26-2005, 06:47 PM
He is posting that those games would be winners if you went AGAINST the public and took the other side.
Not sure where the numbers came from, cause only ONE side was over 80% at sportsinsights (the most reliable source IMO for these numbers) yesterday, and that was INDY (81%).
I didn't even look at the totals, and Philly and Dallas were both in the low to mid 70% range at sportsinsights.
And, unposted plays are frowned upon here.
Read the rules.
DO NOT start a thread stating you won a game, or games.
DO NOT post plays after the games have started, or are over.
No offense, but if you can't post em before gametime, you ain't helping anyone bro....we all know who won the games yesterday, and we can all look at the numbers and see who the public was on.
HOMEDAWG
09-26-2005, 06:51 PM
STIF, he is using sportsbook... Not very accurate,but a good source!
HOMEDAWG
09-26-2005, 07:02 PM
over 36,000 bets tracked online yesterday in the PITT/NE game and 56% on PITT... results 44% bettors won!
right now there are over 34,000 online bets for the DEN/KC game and there are 29% on denver!
both at 3
:beer2:
SPORTSINSIGHTS!:thumbs:
Stifler's Mom
09-26-2005, 07:11 PM
Sportsbook.com by chance?
I used to use them to track. Not very accurate at all compared to some of the other books on the market.
Sportsbook.com tends to be a very "public" dominated book, and their numbers are often inflated because of it....for example, i used to see stuff like 98% on certain sides there during basketball season. There's NO WAY 98% of all bets, on any game are coming in on one side.
SO....that explains why those other sides were showing like 85% when the other sources were showing in the low 70's.
Whatever works i guess....and that's not even important.
What is important is that posting that you played games after they're over is frowned upon here.
I use wagerline but none of them were 80%, highest was Indi with 70.94%. They highlighted those above 59% and if you faded all that you will get more than 50% winning. It worked in basketball too.
HOMEDAWG
09-26-2005, 07:34 PM
Originally posted by SK35
I use wagerline but none of them were 80%, highest was Indi with 70.94%. They highlighted those above 59% and if you faded all that you will get more than 50% winning. It worked in basketball too.
Correct me if I am wrong, but wagerline picks are not from actual $$$$ bet(contest?)... besides their lines are always off!:beer2:
It maybe not from actual bet but it's still public opinion. And you are right, their lines are usually early lines. They don't update it often. But the fact is (cuz my friend is doing it for a year) you will win more than lose if you fade those highlights. I'm not trying to convince you guys to do that cuz I'm not doing it myself. I think it's more fun when I cap a game and I don't have like bet on 10-15 games a day.
SICKUMBOY
09-26-2005, 08:05 PM
Stifler,
Relax buddy. I've given people the info so that they can go to sportsbook 5 minutes before gametime and take a look. You don't need me to post this info, as my weekly picks, just check out the site.
If I put my bets in on wed, thur etc., with the same info, I would not have the same fantastic winning percentages in NFL as I do so far -- 82%. 8-10 games were above 80% during the week, and actually 6-8 up to 30 minutes prior. Like I stated in last weeks post, I am very disciplined
If you want to know my bets, check sportsbook.com 5 minutes before the noon games. If the goal is to help those in need of picks, I cannot post my plays, b/c I'm too busy making them.
Listen, I don't care if you listen to me, and I'm not trying to tell you how to bet. All I'm letting people know is how I am betting and how it is working.
To all of you who followed from last weeks post, congrats on 75% this week.
The War Dogs
09-26-2005, 08:19 PM
This is the same guy who was here last few weeks and got banned for being an asshole. New name, same asshole.
Stifler's Mom
09-26-2005, 08:24 PM
I know, lol....i can see that with features of the site you guys can't use.
If I ban him, he'll just sign up again anyway, lol
The War Dogs
09-26-2005, 08:27 PM
What's unfortunate is that he isn't alltogether wrong. I've been doing a form of the same thing and done fairly well although not yesterday.
But there's no reason for the attitude that just pisses everyone off. Just post plays, that's all.
BillyBarooooooo
09-26-2005, 08:29 PM
He is not wrong with somethings!!!! If you do remeber last week he was 0-6!!!!!!!!!! He is just a ass hole and I already have one of them, don't need another..................
BB:flush:
Stifler's Mom
09-26-2005, 08:31 PM
I agree about the attitude.
NO one's gonna get any shit for posting plays, win or lose, or no matter how they come up with em....but posting how you won so and so yesterday they weren't posted here is just not allowed.
If anyone feels the need to post just to brag, allow me to send you 50 cents or however the hell much a pay phone costs these days so you can call someone who gives a F**K.
I don't post my plays because I don't play them until 5 minutes before gametime
Quick Nick, is that you?
:bang:
SICKUMBOY
09-26-2005, 08:50 PM
Guys,
The guy you are talking about from last week was adamfred.
I am not the same guy. I didn't mean to piss anyone off. If I did I'm sorry.
All I am trying to do is give someone who is not picking well possibly a different method, or whats working for me.
It does upset me when people come in and try to bash a method that is working. you guys are over analzing my post.
The War Dogs
09-26-2005, 08:54 PM
Bullshit, same writing style, same attitude, same everything. If you would like to grow up, we can help, if not...
:out: :bbang:
The War Dogs
09-26-2005, 08:58 PM
Stif, could u at least move this to the toilet??
SICKUMBOY
09-26-2005, 09:00 PM
you guys crack me up. pretty defensive for people who are winning all kinds of money.
wether or not you like me or my writing style, the plays are working. You guys are hurting those who are following or even looking further into what I am talking about.
It's hilarious, I'm not that loser adamfred from last week. I remember reading his stuff last week as well.
Look back at my post from last week. see how cautious and courteous I was. the reason I was is b/c I saw how you bashed him about his philosophy. Now I admit he was pretty rude, and thats on him
SICKUMBOY
09-26-2005, 09:10 PM
On second thought, don't even waste your time banning me, whatever that means. I will not post anymore.
You guys can track this info over the year, ( it seems like you guys have plenty of time on your hands, when you are not using them to jerk each other off) and when you see the end results, you can send your apologies.
What a bunch of losers.
BillyBarroooo, you can fuck off too buddy. I live in Chicago as well and am making the conclusion youre a fag who lives on the northside.
HOMEDAWG
09-26-2005, 09:12 PM
:ohman:
luckym
09-26-2005, 09:27 PM
Circle Jerk tonight anybody?
HOMEDAWG
09-26-2005, 09:35 PM
:bow: :huddle: :jig: :happy: :drive:
Horfin
09-26-2005, 09:44 PM
Originally posted by SICKUMBOY
On second thought, don't even waste your time banning me, whatever that means. I will not post anymore.
You guys can track this info over the year, ( it seems like you guys have plenty of time on your hands, when you are not using them to jerk each other off) and when you see the end results, you can send your apologies.
What a bunch of losers.
BillyBarroooo, you can fuck off too buddy. I live in Chicago as well and am making the conclusion youre a fag who lives on the northside.
Goodbye
Q-Unit
09-26-2005, 09:49 PM
WOW talk about a mood change from the first letter of a post to the end of his paragraph.
Even if he isn't the same fckstick, sure loooooves those fading public play systems!
I shoulda listened to this weekend, I sure got pounded, but then again I didnt check which plays were public, I was too busy telling rothko to get out of my personal circle jerk LOL.
BaMan
10-27-2005, 03:35 AM
:yeah: :yeah: :yeah:
vBulletin® v3.7.1, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.